WIKINDX Resources  

Maes, Hans. "Art or Porn: Clear division or false dilemma?." Philosophy and Literature 35. (2011): 51–64. 
Added by: joachim (11/19/12, 8:03 PM)   
Resource type: Journal Article
Language: en: English
Peer reviewed
DOI: 10.1353/phl.2011.0003
BibTeX citation key: Maes2011
Email resource to friend
View all bibliographic details
Categories: General
Keywords: "Lost Girls", Art, Gebbie. Melinda, Moore. Alan, Pornography, United Kingdom
Creators: Maes
Collection: Philosophy and Literature
Views: 15/781
Art or Porn? The popular media will often choose this heading when reviewing the latest sexually explicit novel, film, or art exhibition. The underlying assumption seems to be that the work under discussion has to be one or the other, and cannot be both. But is this not a false dilemma? Can one really draw a sharp dividing line between the two domains? I think not. I will argue that there is a middle ground between art and pornography and that this middle ground is occupied by numerous paintings, prints, photographs, films, novels and graphic novels. As such, I believe that the phrase ‘pornographic art,’ far from being an oxymoron, actually designates a legitimate artistic category. There is strong opposition to this view in the philosophy of art today. Both Jerrold Levinson and Christy Mag Uidhir have recently argued that pornography and art are mutually exclusive. So, my first task is to show that their arguments, though well-crafted and carefully formulated, ultimately fail.
Added by: joachim  
WIKINDX 6.9.1 | Total resources: 14557 | Username: -- | Bibliography: WIKINDX Master Bibliography | Style: Modern Language Association (MLA)