|
BOBC |
 |
 |
 |
|
Bullen, David. "On the Origin of a Supervillain: The neo-victorian reinvention of mister sinister." Neo-Victorian Villains. Adaptations and Transformations in Popular Culture. Ed. Benjamin Poore. Neo-Victorian Series. Leiden: Brill, 2017. 180–96. Added by: joachim (9/9/19, 6:36 PM) Last edited by: joachim (9/9/19, 6:49 PM) |
| Resource type: Book Article Language: en: English DOI: 10.1163/9789004322257_010 BibTeX citation key: Bullen2017 Email resource to friend View all bibliographic details  |
Categories: General Keywords: "X-Men", Intertextuality, Metaisierung, Superhero, USA Creators: Bullen, Poore Publisher: Brill (Leiden) Collection: Neo-Victorian Villains. Adaptations and Transformations in Popular Culture |
Views: 11/379
|
| Attachments |
| Abstract |
|
First introduced in Uncanny X-Men #221 (1987), Chris Claremont and Marc Silvestri’s supervillain Mister Sinister quickly became a prominent foe in the comic-book series. It was not until 1996, however, that his origins were first ‘revealed’: Mister Sinister was in fact Nathaniel Essex, a Victorian scientist obsessed with Darwinian evolutionary theory, transformed by an ancient Egyptian power into an immortal. Sinister’s brand of amoral villainy has always espoused a certain element of social Darwinism, but in recreating him as a neo-Victorian, this ideology was explicitly linked back to the historical Darwin. In this chapter I aim to trace the development of Sinister from the 1980s to the present day, charting his transition from generic megalomaniac to postmodernist device for the X-men comics to meta-fictionally reflect back on their own real and imagined origins.
|
PHP execution time: 0.05431 s
SQL execution time: 0.12095 s
TPL rendering time: 0.00283 s
Total elapsed time: 0.17809 s
Peak memory usage: 5.2922 MB
Memory at close: 1.2073 MB
Database queries: 71